Wednesday, May 27, 2015

FNI: Bashers and Hypers

As a five-month old small time trader, reading the comments on numerous threads from Facebook stock market groups provides me a free education how to conduct my own trading activity. Just recently, one stock caught my attention due to frustration of those who suffer big paper loss as a result of buying FNI on the basis of "experts'" analysis.

Out of curiosity, I checked FNI's company disclosures. I focused particularly on its 2014 Annual Report and 2015 1st Quarterly Report. I was looking for an answer for the constant decline of FNI's market price, and at the same for a potential gain. As the saying goes, "where there's smoke, there's fire." I know it's risky, but that's part of a trader's life. 



After reading the reports, I found details that are both popular and unknown to FNI owners. I am hesitant to post the unknown details on those threads for I do not want to be misunderstood as making fun of the pain of those who are losing their hard-earned money. Instead, I decided to write about it hoping that this article could help somehow in finding answer for FNI's decline. I know that the truth hurts, but knowing it is better than relying on false hope.

Before I share what I found, I want to clarify that I might be mistaken in my analysis. This is just my personal interpretation of the mentioned reports. I encourage FNI owners to check the documents for themselves.

These are the details:

1. FNI's book value as of 1Q2015 is 0.29. Of course, some technical analysts who consider book value as irrelevant in their trading would dismiss its importance. And others would even argue that the book value approach is not applicable to FNI. I respect their opinion. However, as for me, unless the firm has an established performance of earnings for several years, I would never venture buying a stock with a high Price to Book Value ratio.  


2. Increase in authorized and outstanding shares. From 7,300,000,000 authorized shares in June 2014, FNI has increased them into 35,871,428,572 as of December 2014. When it comes to outstanding shares, they were increased from 7,003,920,939 to 17,467,014,310 as of December 2014. I think it is important to understand the implications of these increase on your portfolio. Knowing the difference between the authorized shares and the outstanding shares affects your investment in that stock due to its potential for stock dilution. This is what Investopedia has to say about this: 
"Dilution reduces a stockholder’s share of ownership and voting power in a company and reduces a stock’s earnings per share when new stock is issued. The larger the difference between the number of authorized shares and the number of outstanding shares, the greater the potential for dilution."
Concerning the increase in outstanding shares, I think the acquisition of PGMC has a lot to say about this. In exchange to 99.5% ownership of PGMC, FNI issued 10,463,093,371 common shares to the 13 stockholders of PGMC. This is how I understand that "share swap" thing. 

3. PSE's suspension of FNI. PSE suspended FNI from public trading due to the firm's non-compliance with the 10% minimum public ownership requirement. This suspension took effect during the 1Q2013. As of December 2012, FNI's public float was 2.41%. The suspension was lifted after FNI complied with the PSE requirement and it resumed public trading again beginning 2Q2013. At present, FNI's free float level is 22.91%. It is just interesting that FNI declared a huge cash dividends of 1.656/share on May 22, 2013 while the lifting of the suspension happened on June 2013. 

4. Government incentives. Verify if this is true. Is it really true that PGMC's fiscal incentive and income tax holiday will expire this 2015?

5. Third largest nickel producer. This is popular. I think most investors know this that makes FNI's "low" price attractive. PGMC is considered as the third largest nickel producer in the Philippines. As of 2014, PGMC produced 10% of nickel ore production.

6. Unrestricted earnings as of December 2014: 4,691.5 M. This is another thing that makes FNI attractive. Considering this, the speculation that FNI will soon be delisted from PSE is unlikely to happen.

7. History of Market Price from 2012 to December 2014. As of 2012, 4Q was the best. It gave both a great buying and selling opportunities with a low price of 1.21 and a high price of 3.34. Realizing this, what's happening right now in FNI's price is not something new. As of 2013, 2Q was the best. You could buy FNI @ 0.9 and sell it @ 1.98. Reaching 2014, 1Q was the best quarter to buy @ 0.96 and between 2Q and 3Q as the best time to sell @ a price between 3.00 to 3.01. 

Question: What does this price history tell you about trading decision concerning this stock?

8. Key Performance Indicators. As of 1Q2015, FNI's ROE and ROA are (4.172%) and (3.030%) and its EPS was (0.030879). In other words, 1Q2015 had a negative return. There are traders and investors that such negative financial report is a sufficient reason to sell this stock. However, just focusing on 1Q2015 would give a superficial impression that buying FNI is not profitable. But if you will review the firm's performance during the previous year, you will get a bigger picture of the company's financial standing. As of AR2014, FNI's ROE and ROA were 89% and 63% and its EPS was 0.66. Now, that's impressive! Another thing I like about this company is its small debt. As of 2014, its Debt to Equity ratio was 0.41 and it was even reduced down to 0.369 this 1Q2015.  

9. Stock subscription. FNI deposited 50M of the 200M stock subscription in PGMC on March 31, 2015. 

10. Production period. PGMC mine is only in production durng drier months of the year between April to October of each year. This explains the 216,277M loss in 1Q2015, which represents the recurring and general administrative expenses of the company.

After reading these details, can this blogger be categorized as an FNI hyper or a basher? I can't control what you think. I am not an FNI hyper for I do not own any shares in this company. At the same time, I am also not a basher for I intend to buy at my entry price. My goal is just to satisfy my curiosity about the popularity of this stock. I also wish that understanding these details would be of help somehow particularly for those who suffer an emotional setback as result of paper loss. As for the "joke" that FNI's price could sink down to 1.00/share and even to 0.50/share is a possibility that present owners must prepare themselves emotionally. However, this is not the end of your world. The stock could bounce back anytime. 



Thursday, May 21, 2015

My # 2 Stock: DMPL-



Since Del Monte Pacific Limited acquired DMFI in 2013, its capital structure changed. During the early stage of the acquisition announcement, the market received it positively. After releasing to the public the firm's financial statements with negative returns, its share price started to decline. The firm stopped paying dividends to shareholders. Many investors left this stock. It was during its decline that this stock got my attention and so I researched for its cause. After reviewing the annual and quarterly reports of the company, I am still cautious. I think if DMPL will be able to digest DMFI, it will grow more than 4x its previous size. That would mean, its share price could jump from 12.68, its current price to above 40.00. There is no better time to buy this stock than now. Still the crucial part is the release of its 4Q FY2015!

---0---

Update as of July 1, 2015

1. Trade Summary 

Lowest Price: 11.56 

Highest %: 67.25% @ 12.00 

Average: 11.92 

Volume: 531,200 

Number of Trades: 91 

Net Foreign: 5,385,872.00 


2. Personal Interpretation

What do these numbers mean? The way I see it though the volume and the number of trades are still small, but this could be a signal of a reversal. If my memory serves me right, I think for 6 months DMPL's price just ranged between 10.70 to 13.50, a big drop from 27.05 in May 2013 due to DMFI acquisition. Another thing to notice is the entry of CLSA just today. Between June 15 to June 30, you cannot see CLSA trading DMPL. Unlike ATR Kim, which I consider an "early bird," CLSA is just waiting for the release of 4Q FY2015 before making a decision. As of today, July 1st, due to impressive improvement in DMPL's financial standing, CLSA is the biggest solid buyer with a net amount of Php 3,600,000.00 followed by ATR KIM, Php 1,102,004.00.

---0---

July 2 Update

Lowest Price: 12.00

Highest %: 56.58 % @ 12.70 (This is a good sign from 12.00 with highest % yesterday).

Average: 12.65

Volume: 584,400

# of Trades: 160

Net Foreign: 5,731,084.00

Notable Buyers:

1. ATR KIM

Volume: 300,400

Buy Amount: 3.8M

Average: 12.67

2. UOB KAY HIAN

Volume: 120,000

Buy Amount: 1.5M

Average: 12.67

3. DEUTSCHE

Volume: 62,500

Buy Amount: 786K

Average: 12.58

Notable Sellers:

1. The First Resources Man

Volume: 223,000

Buy Amount: 2.8M

Average: 12.67

2. PH Equity Partners (PEP)

Volume: 160,300

Buy Amount: 2M

Average: 12.69

3. BPI SEC

Volume: 51,100

Buy Amount: 643K

Average: 12.59

Comment:

The volume slightly increased compared to yesterday's trade. As for number of trades, 69 more were added. What I consider a good sign is the increase in average price in trading DMPL. I missed CLSA. Was it done buying and waiting for an exit price?

What I want to see in the coming days is the doubling or even tripling of volume and the number of trades. How I wish DMPL will return to its previous price of 27.05. But I think, it will take another quarter or if not the whole FY 2016 to convince investors that DMPL has returned to profitability. For now, as a trader of stocks with fundamentals, what I am guarding is unusual market volatility caused by uncertainty among investors and traders alike related to the possible increase of interest rates. In the meantime, I think I will guard the movement of the above 4 brokers to determine my own exit price: CLSA, ATR KIM, UOB KAY HIAN and DEUTSCHE.  

My # 1 Stock: PX

The numbers provided by both the AR2014 and 1QR2015 of Philex Mining Corporation are not impressive. However, since PX is a gold stock, I believe that this stock has a long prospect, for about 5 to 10 years. Buying this stock is my way to protect my income from inflationary monetary policy. Almost everyone I talked to in several stock market fora do not like this stock. Their primary reason? In addition to the current decline of mining sector, the restrictive regulation of PH government adds more burden to mining firms. But I think the real reason why they fail to appreciate the value of a gold stock is that they don't understand the economics of gold. 



The major barrier to the growth of gold price is political. I think that governments will continually inflate the money supply in the coming years "to save the market" from itself. As I review the price history of gold, I realized that for 4 years now, its price has been depressed. I don't think that it will last 5 or 10 years more. The longest period in recent history that the price of gold has been depressed was 13 years, between 1988 to 2001. Both governments and central banks hate gold for it limits their power to create fiat currency. But they cannot do it indefinitely. Sooner or later, there will be a day of reckoning. When that time comes, investments in gold in whatever form - bullion, coins, mining shares - will soar! This is the best long-term investment I can suggest to my relatives and friends.


Relevant Article:

China Is Laying the Groundwork for a Gold Standard Right Now (Video)