Wednesday, May 27, 2015

FNI: Bashers and Hypers

As a five-month old small time trader, reading the comments on numerous threads from Facebook stock market groups provides me a free education how to conduct my own trading activity. Just recently, one stock caught my attention due to frustration of those who suffer big paper loss as a result of buying FNI on the basis of "experts'" analysis.

Out of curiosity, I checked FNI's company disclosures. I focused particularly on its 2014 Annual Report and 2015 1st Quarterly Report. I was looking for an answer for the constant decline of FNI's market price, and at the same for a potential gain. As the saying goes, "where there's smoke, there's fire." I know it's risky, but that's part of a trader's life. 



After reading the reports, I found details that are both popular and unknown to FNI owners. I am hesitant to post the unknown details on those threads for I do not want to be misunderstood as making fun of the pain of those who are losing their hard-earned money. Instead, I decided to write about it hoping that this article could help somehow in finding answer for FNI's decline. I know that the truth hurts, but knowing it is better than relying on false hope.

Before I share what I found, I want to clarify that I might be mistaken in my analysis. This is just my personal interpretation of the mentioned reports. I encourage FNI owners to check the documents for themselves.

These are the details:

1. FNI's book value as of 1Q2015 is 0.29. Of course, some technical analysts who consider book value as irrelevant in their trading would dismiss its importance. And others would even argue that the book value approach is not applicable to FNI. I respect their opinion. However, as for me, unless the firm has an established performance of earnings for several years, I would never venture buying a stock with a high Price to Book Value ratio.  


2. Increase in authorized and outstanding shares. From 7,300,000,000 authorized shares in June 2014, FNI has increased them into 35,871,428,572 as of December 2014. When it comes to outstanding shares, they were increased from 7,003,920,939 to 17,467,014,310 as of December 2014. I think it is important to understand the implications of these increase on your portfolio. Knowing the difference between the authorized shares and the outstanding shares affects your investment in that stock due to its potential for stock dilution. This is what Investopedia has to say about this: 
"Dilution reduces a stockholder’s share of ownership and voting power in a company and reduces a stock’s earnings per share when new stock is issued. The larger the difference between the number of authorized shares and the number of outstanding shares, the greater the potential for dilution."
Concerning the increase in outstanding shares, I think the acquisition of PGMC has a lot to say about this. In exchange to 99.5% ownership of PGMC, FNI issued 10,463,093,371 common shares to the 13 stockholders of PGMC. This is how I understand that "share swap" thing. 

3. PSE's suspension of FNI. PSE suspended FNI from public trading due to the firm's non-compliance with the 10% minimum public ownership requirement. This suspension took effect during the 1Q2013. As of December 2012, FNI's public float was 2.41%. The suspension was lifted after FNI complied with the PSE requirement and it resumed public trading again beginning 2Q2013. At present, FNI's free float level is 22.91%. It is just interesting that FNI declared a huge cash dividends of 1.656/share on May 22, 2013 while the lifting of the suspension happened on June 2013. 

4. Government incentives. Verify if this is true. Is it really true that PGMC's fiscal incentive and income tax holiday will expire this 2015?

5. Third largest nickel producer. This is popular. I think most investors know this that makes FNI's "low" price attractive. PGMC is considered as the third largest nickel producer in the Philippines. As of 2014, PGMC produced 10% of nickel ore production.

6. Unrestricted earnings as of December 2014: 4,691.5 M. This is another thing that makes FNI attractive. Considering this, the speculation that FNI will soon be delisted from PSE is unlikely to happen.

7. History of Market Price from 2012 to December 2014. As of 2012, 4Q was the best. It gave both a great buying and selling opportunities with a low price of 1.21 and a high price of 3.34. Realizing this, what's happening right now in FNI's price is not something new. As of 2013, 2Q was the best. You could buy FNI @ 0.9 and sell it @ 1.98. Reaching 2014, 1Q was the best quarter to buy @ 0.96 and between 2Q and 3Q as the best time to sell @ a price between 3.00 to 3.01. 

Question: What does this price history tell you about trading decision concerning this stock?

8. Key Performance Indicators. As of 1Q2015, FNI's ROE and ROA are (4.172%) and (3.030%) and its EPS was (0.030879). In other words, 1Q2015 had a negative return. There are traders and investors that such negative financial report is a sufficient reason to sell this stock. However, just focusing on 1Q2015 would give a superficial impression that buying FNI is not profitable. But if you will review the firm's performance during the previous year, you will get a bigger picture of the company's financial standing. As of AR2014, FNI's ROE and ROA were 89% and 63% and its EPS was 0.66. Now, that's impressive! Another thing I like about this company is its small debt. As of 2014, its Debt to Equity ratio was 0.41 and it was even reduced down to 0.369 this 1Q2015.  

9. Stock subscription. FNI deposited 50M of the 200M stock subscription in PGMC on March 31, 2015. 

10. Production period. PGMC mine is only in production durng drier months of the year between April to October of each year. This explains the 216,277M loss in 1Q2015, which represents the recurring and general administrative expenses of the company.

After reading these details, can this blogger be categorized as an FNI hyper or a basher? I can't control what you think. I am not an FNI hyper for I do not own any shares in this company. At the same time, I am also not a basher for I intend to buy at my entry price. My goal is just to satisfy my curiosity about the popularity of this stock. I also wish that understanding these details would be of help somehow particularly for those who suffer an emotional setback as result of paper loss. As for the "joke" that FNI's price could sink down to 1.00/share and even to 0.50/share is a possibility that present owners must prepare themselves emotionally. However, this is not the end of your world. The stock could bounce back anytime. 



Thursday, May 21, 2015

My # 2 Stock: DMPL-



Since Del Monte Pacific Limited acquired DMFI in 2013, its capital structure changed. During the early stage of the acquisition announcement, the market received it positively. After releasing to the public the firm's financial statements with negative returns, its share price started to decline. The firm stopped paying dividends to shareholders. Many investors left this stock. It was during its decline that this stock got my attention and so I researched for its cause. After reviewing the annual and quarterly reports of the company, I am still cautious. I think if DMPL will be able to digest DMFI, it will grow more than 4x its previous size. That would mean, its share price could jump from 12.68, its current price to above 40.00. There is no better time to buy this stock than now. Still the crucial part is the release of its 4Q FY2015!

---0---

Update as of July 1, 2015

1. Trade Summary 

Lowest Price: 11.56 

Highest %: 67.25% @ 12.00 

Average: 11.92 

Volume: 531,200 

Number of Trades: 91 

Net Foreign: 5,385,872.00 


2. Personal Interpretation

What do these numbers mean? The way I see it though the volume and the number of trades are still small, but this could be a signal of a reversal. If my memory serves me right, I think for 6 months DMPL's price just ranged between 10.70 to 13.50, a big drop from 27.05 in May 2013 due to DMFI acquisition. Another thing to notice is the entry of CLSA just today. Between June 15 to June 30, you cannot see CLSA trading DMPL. Unlike ATR Kim, which I consider an "early bird," CLSA is just waiting for the release of 4Q FY2015 before making a decision. As of today, July 1st, due to impressive improvement in DMPL's financial standing, CLSA is the biggest solid buyer with a net amount of Php 3,600,000.00 followed by ATR KIM, Php 1,102,004.00.

---0---

July 2 Update

Lowest Price: 12.00

Highest %: 56.58 % @ 12.70 (This is a good sign from 12.00 with highest % yesterday).

Average: 12.65

Volume: 584,400

# of Trades: 160

Net Foreign: 5,731,084.00

Notable Buyers:

1. ATR KIM

Volume: 300,400

Buy Amount: 3.8M

Average: 12.67

2. UOB KAY HIAN

Volume: 120,000

Buy Amount: 1.5M

Average: 12.67

3. DEUTSCHE

Volume: 62,500

Buy Amount: 786K

Average: 12.58

Notable Sellers:

1. The First Resources Man

Volume: 223,000

Buy Amount: 2.8M

Average: 12.67

2. PH Equity Partners (PEP)

Volume: 160,300

Buy Amount: 2M

Average: 12.69

3. BPI SEC

Volume: 51,100

Buy Amount: 643K

Average: 12.59

Comment:

The volume slightly increased compared to yesterday's trade. As for number of trades, 69 more were added. What I consider a good sign is the increase in average price in trading DMPL. I missed CLSA. Was it done buying and waiting for an exit price?

What I want to see in the coming days is the doubling or even tripling of volume and the number of trades. How I wish DMPL will return to its previous price of 27.05. But I think, it will take another quarter or if not the whole FY 2016 to convince investors that DMPL has returned to profitability. For now, as a trader of stocks with fundamentals, what I am guarding is unusual market volatility caused by uncertainty among investors and traders alike related to the possible increase of interest rates. In the meantime, I think I will guard the movement of the above 4 brokers to determine my own exit price: CLSA, ATR KIM, UOB KAY HIAN and DEUTSCHE.  

My # 1 Stock: PX

The numbers provided by both the AR2014 and 1QR2015 of Philex Mining Corporation are not impressive. However, since PX is a gold stock, I believe that this stock has a long prospect, for about 5 to 10 years. Buying this stock is my way to protect my income from inflationary monetary policy. Almost everyone I talked to in several stock market fora do not like this stock. Their primary reason? In addition to the current decline of mining sector, the restrictive regulation of PH government adds more burden to mining firms. But I think the real reason why they fail to appreciate the value of a gold stock is that they don't understand the economics of gold. 



The major barrier to the growth of gold price is political. I think that governments will continually inflate the money supply in the coming years "to save the market" from itself. As I review the price history of gold, I realized that for 4 years now, its price has been depressed. I don't think that it will last 5 or 10 years more. The longest period in recent history that the price of gold has been depressed was 13 years, between 1988 to 2001. Both governments and central banks hate gold for it limits their power to create fiat currency. But they cannot do it indefinitely. Sooner or later, there will be a day of reckoning. When that time comes, investments in gold in whatever form - bullion, coins, mining shares - will soar! This is the best long-term investment I can suggest to my relatives and friends.


Relevant Article:

China Is Laying the Groundwork for a Gold Standard Right Now (Video)

Thursday, April 23, 2015

Reasons for Buying CROWN



After reading CROWN's prospectus, I came up with a list of reasons for buying this stock on its IPO day:


  • Lower number of outstanding shares. The firm's total authorized shares is 1.3 B. Its present total number of shares is 472.8 M. Through this IPO, 158 M shares will be added. The total number of common shares will be 630.8 M after the IPO. This will increase the BVPS from 1.19 to 1.22. This is still small compared to other firms. This means that lesser number of stockholders will share with the firm's profit. 

  • I see CROWN as an emerging growth stock. The firm has been growing since 2012. It is adding 62 new employees into its 246 existing employees, purchasing new land, and building new structures beginning April 2015 to March 2016.  

  • Dividends policy is clear. Its 10% of net income.

  • Strong financial ratios: D/E - 0.47; E/A - 0.67; BVPS after the IPO - 1.22; P/BV - 1.15; P/E - 10.07; ROE - 11.61%; DY - 1.04%, and; ROI - 12.65%.

  • Reasons for capital raising: plant and equipment, debt retirement, modernization of plant, and working capital. Debt retirement will strengthen the firm's balance sheet.

  • Competitive strengths. The firm has been in operation for 25 years and has been offering quality and USP products. The company considers DNL as compounds' leader. CROWN's total income is close to 1/3 of DNLs. Since DNL is trading @ 21.00/share, CROWN could potentially be trading fairly @ 7.00/share in the near future. In pipes, Neltex is the leader and CROWN is the fifth, but in terms of net profit, CROWN is the 3rd next to Emerald. 

  • Impressive website and prospectus. These demonstrate that the firm anticipates something big beginning this April 2015. 

  • Taking advantage of the opportunity in construction sector. 

  • Favorite words of the company: quality, relationship, customization, modernization and increase. Great company culture.

  • The firm has strong customer base.

  • The firm owns 51 motor vehicles.

  • Products and services. The company has 2 business groups, compounds and pipes. Compounds are used in wires, cables and bottles. Pipes are used in electrical, potable, telecom wiring and gas pipelines. The company is a pioneer in PP-R pipes. 


Wednesday, April 22, 2015

Retail Sector

In terms of total assets under the retail sector, CAL is the smallest. It has 1.6 B total assets as of Sept 2014. RRHI is the leader with 57.4 B; followed by PGOLD, 53.6 B; SSI, 15.1 B, and SEVN, 7.8 B. 



In terms of earnings per share (EPS), on the basis of September 2014 quarterly report, CAL is the highest considering its small total assets compared to its competitors. ITS EPS was 0.22. Others have the following EPS:

RRHI - 2.60

PGOLD - 1.63

SSI - 0.29

SEVN - 1.91


Concerning debt to equity ratio [D/E (x)], RRHI is the most conservative followed by PGOLD. Their balance sheet is very strong. SSI is the weakest.


RRHI - 0.39

PGOLD - 0.56

SSI - 2.96

SEVN - 1.39

CAL - 0.96


How about price to book value ratio [P/BV (x)]? I think CAL is the most fairly valued with 1.52. SEVN is overpriced with 15.59. RRHI's P/BV is 2.92, PGOLD's is 3.18, and SSI's is 8.58.


Again, when it comes to price to earnings ratio [P/E (x)], CAL is the cheapest stock with 15.86. SEVN is the most expensive, 58.63. RRHI has a 32.15 P/E ratio, PGOLD has 24.20, and SSI has 34.13.


When it comes to return on equity (ROE), SEVN is the highest with 26.90% followed by SSI with 17.62%. PGOLD has the 3rd highest ROE with 13.20%. CAL is the 4th with 9.65%. RRHI has 9.53% ROE.

Finally, concerning dividend yield, PGOLD is the first with 0.50% followed by RRHI with 0.49% and SEVN with 0.26%. Both CAL and SSI have no dividend yield. CAL stopped paying dividend last 2014. And SSI was just publicly listed last November 7, 2014. 

On the basis of these numbers, CAL will be the best choice for investment. However, since its financial report for 2014 is still not available, its better to wait first to know the firm's financial standing as of 2014. Once the report is released and shows an unfavorable outcome, the next investment option in retail sector would either be RRHI or PGOLD. As for me, I will go for RRHI provided that both its P/BV and P/E ratios will go down a little bit.      


SHNG and LAND



Among 86 companies under the property sector, PSE included 15 in its index. The existence of these numerous companies shows that real estate industry is booming in the country. Whether it is a bubble or not is another question. Among 15 companies, in PSE property index, my broker selected 7. They are ALI, CPG, FLI, MEG, RLC, SMPH and VLL. During my first three months in the stock market, I tried three stocks from my broker's list: ALI, SMPH and MEG. As a result, I gained once in ALI, twice in SMPH, and almost even in MEG. However, after reaching a price almost close to their "fair value," these three stocks started to dance sideways. This makes it difficult for me to enter. And so I did my own research and came up with my own list after using fundamental analysis. I came up with 11 stocks. My only criterion is to do further research on stocks that are consistently paying out dividends. To my surprise, 8 stocks in PSE property index did not appear in my list and 1 in my broker's list, CPG. I think if there is any common opinion I share with both PSE property index and my broker, it is about MEG and FLI. What surprises me is the exclusion of both SHNG and LAND. Among the 11 stocks in my list, I see SHNG as the most attractive. Its P/E ratio is 5.60; P/BV ratio is 0.64, and; its ROI is 16.5%. LAND on the other hand is the next undervalued stock following SHNG with a P/BV ratio of 0.75. I wonder about the reason for exclusion. Perhaps, the experts know something about these 2 companies that the financial statements do not show. That's the limitation of a small time individual investor.  

Sunday, March 22, 2015

An Experiment in Stock Valuation: Market Price and BVPS

I want to make an experiment in stock valuation. I intend to use this as a personal reference in investing, trading and speculating. Don't ask me how I manage to combine these three approaches. Personally, I prefer long-term investment, but with the kind of market that we have, I consider it blind to stick with this plan regardless of stocks that you buy. I still believe that long-term investing is applicable particularly if you still have time and has enough patience to wait for several years. 

We are living in an interventionist society. And so the stock market is no place for long-term investors who follow conventional wisdom. In a market that we have, whether you like it or not, you will be pushed either to speculate or trade. 

In this experiment, I selected 8 tickers and 2 of them are not included in my portfolio. And by the way, I have to emphasize that this article is NOT A RECOMMENDATION to buy the stocks I selected. I am simply learning while writing my thoughts and do actual trading. 

The 8 tickers are as follows: CAL, CEB, COSCO, CPV, DMPL, EDC, PSPC and PX. In this article, I just want to focus on market price and book value per share of these stocks. 

Market Value (MV)

What is a market price of a stock? A market price of a stock is "the current price at which the stock is traded" at PSE. As of March 22, 2015, the market price of my selected stocks are as follows:

CAL: 3.94 

CEB: 86.05 

COSCO: 9.14 

CPV: 5.6

DMPL: 12.2 

EDC: 8.19 

PSPC: 2.88 

PX: 7.62

Book Value (BV)

Now let's go to book value per share (BVPS). What is BVPS? BVPS is

"A measure used by owners of common shares in a firm to determine the level of safety associated with each individual share after all debts are paid accordingly. Should the company decide to dissolve, the book value per common share indicates the peso value remaining for common shareholders after all assets are liquidated and all debtors are paid. In simple terms, it would be the amount of money that a holder of a common share would get if a company were to liquidate." - Investopedia

Computation:

BVPS = Value of Common Equity (Total Shareholder Equity - Preferred Equity) / 

# of Shares Outstanding

The Book Value of the 8 Stocks as of 2014

CAL: 828,645,599 / 359,827,000 = 2.30

CEB: 22,554,884,877 / 605,953,330 = 37.22

COSCO: 58,423,000,000 / 7,401,763,564 = 7.89 

CPV: 1,260,676,104 / 564,210,000 = 2.23

DMPL: 10,048,852,000 (228,383,000*44) / 1,944,035,406 = 5.16 

EDC: 35,433,800,000/18,750,000,000 = 1.88

PSPC: 3,449,920,000 / 2,165,024,111 = 1.59

PX: 26,110,000,000 / 4,940,399,068 = 5.28

Notes:

1. CAL's BV is based on a balance sheet reported as of December 31, 2014 and the number of outstanding shares is current.

2. CEB's BV is based on a balance sheet reported as of September 30, 2014 and the number of outstanding shares is current. 

3. COSCO's BV is based on a balance sheet reported as of December 31, 2014 and the number of outstanding shares is current. Moreover, the figures in the report are expressed in million and that is why I added 6 zeros to COSCO's total common equity for computation:

Total Assets: 82,420 - Total Liabilities: 23,997 = Shareholders' Equity: 58.423 

4. CPV's BV is based on a balance sheet reported as of December 31, 2013 and the number of outstanding shares is current.

5. DMPL's BV is based on balance sheet reported as of December 31, 2013 and the total # of outstanding shares is current. Furthermore, the original figures are expressed in USD in thousand and the forex applied is 1USD=44Php.

6. EDC's BV is based on balance sheet reported as of December 31, 2012 and the total # of outstanding shares is current.

7. PSPC's BV is based on balance sheet reported as of June 30, 2014 and the total # of outstanding shares is current.

8. PX's BV is based on balance sheet reported as of March 31, 2014 and the total # of outstanding shares is current. 

9. I am aware that to have a more accurate data, one has to use either a "weighted outstanding shares" (which I do not have time to research now and my initial impression is that the subject is too technical) or to go back to the past (which can on only be done if you have Michael J. Fox's time machine) to come up with the exact shares outstanding consistent to the year the book value of the stocks was reported.. And so I deliberately ignore this difficulty and simply worked with figures taken from two different time to compute BVPS. 

Comparing Market Value (MV) with Book Value (BV) 

Finally, let us compare the market value (MV) and the book value (BV) of the 8 stocks:

CAL                MV: 3.94                   BV: 2.30 

CEB                MV: 86.05                 BV: 37.22

COSCO           MV: 9.14                   BV: 7.89 

CPV               MV: 5.6                     BV: 2.23 

DMPL             MV: 12.2                   BV: 5.16 

EDC               MV: 8.19                   BV: 1.88 

PSPC              MV: 2.88                   BV: 1.59 

PX                 MV: 7.62                   BV: 5.28

I used purple color in typing the stocks, which I think in a market flooded with excessive liquidity are not "overpriced". However, these stocks are problematic. For one, PX is under the mining sector, which I assume all analysts agree is in the downward and sell trend. 

Second, both CAL and PSPC are unpopular. In fact, their IPO stories are not good. After reaching higher prices than the initial offering for a short period of time, they sunk below their original prices. 

Third, the fundamentals of COSCO is good. However, its financial statements and EPS appears questionable to me. The firm reported a soaring income in 2014, but paid a very minimal dividend to its shareholders. 

Fourth, both CEB and EDC are considered solid firms. In fact, they are included in one broker's top stock picks this 2015. Though the USD is strong and it certainly has an impact on CEB's financial position, still I have no question about its market price due to the low price of oil, which a huge part of their operational expenses goes. But in the case of EDC, I am beginning to doubt its soundness, not only because it has been into expensive renewable energy but I sense the interfering hand of the government in this firm. 

Finally, though I am suffering loss in buying DMPL, but instinctively I like this stock after reading a considerable number of pages of the company's report. I just wish that my instinct is right. If there is a way for me to ask few of their personnel, I want to know which firm they consider a strong competitor and also questions related to the financial impact and current status of its acquisition of DMFI.