Friday, July 17, 2015

Future Hyperinflation in the US and Current Condition of Greek's Financial Sector

Just finished reading two articles from the Zero Hedge. They are about a possible hyperinflation scenario in the US and an interesting event in Greek's banking industry. 

The writer enumerated several concrete steps for Americans to protect themselves in case of hyperinflation. I could not relate with his other suggestions except those related to investment in natural resources, agriculture, and commodities; and to the purchase of tradable items such as jewelry, food, and foreign currency. It is also interesting that though he thinks it could be sooner depending on the turn of events, he gave "the mid-2020's to early 2030's" as a tentative period where this event could take place.   

The other article is about what's going on right now in Greek's financial sector. The writer talks about those who are taking risky decisions in continually trusting the banking sector. They include big stockholders and bondholders, the ECB, blue-chip investors, the Greek government, speculators, retail investors, and Greek depositors. Among the blue-chip investors are Fairfax Financial Holdings, Capital Group, Wellington Management Group, Hedge Fund Paulson and Company, and Dimensional Fund Advisors. The first three actually increased their stakes, while the last two decided to stick it out. What follows are relevant statements that describe the situation:   

". . . any new recapitalization of the banks is likely to hit shareholders and certain bondholders under a new set of European regulations—the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive—enacted at the beginning of the year."


"This becomes all the more obvious when observing that the ECB itself is now the single biggest stakeholder in the Greek banking system, with some €130 billion in claims, well above the total amount of deposits, suggesting that any other Greek bank liabilities are now almost certainly null and void." 

"The Greek state already owns sizable chunks of the major banks following a recapitalization in 2013. Existing shareholders were given warrants by the government to buy back their stakes; the share prices have, however, continued to collapse following the bailout."


". . . speculative investors, including a number of Greek retail investors and high net worth investors, picked up stocks in Greek banks."


". . . bank depositors are nothing more than unsecured creditors. If and when the reality of the Greek economic collapse is fully tabulated (as the IMF appears to have finally done) it won't be just the equity that is wiped out - depositors themselves face the risk of creeping haircuts to their 'liabilities.'"

Other institutional investors chose the other way; they sold their shares. They include "the Dutch national pension fund, Franklin Templeton, TIAA-CREFF, and emerging market hedge fund Charlemagne Capital, . . ."

After seeing the present scenario in Greek's banking industry, I am thinking about the source of its primary threat. Will the Greeks continue to trust the banking sector after experiencing first-hand the pain of a bank run? Or will they rush into the banks and withdraw all the deposits they have? If the latter be the case, we are about to see what would be the next move of the authorities to restrain such distrust. 

Thursday, July 16, 2015

PX: Downward Trend Again?

Though I know the economics of gold, still it is difficult to see the price of a gold stock, PX going down. I saw it came down from 6.20 to 5.56 and then bounced back to 5.97 during the first two weeks of this month, from July 1 to 15. Today, it seems that a downward trend is happening again. PX's closed near its low price at 5.90.



I am tempted to sell my PX shares and wait for this stock at the bottom and buy again. Two technical analysts told me that it could go down as low as 4.50 before it would bounce back again. However, despite the fact that the price of gold today is reaching another historical low, I changed my mind after listening to the video below.





I hope the speaker is right that we will see the price of gold and precious metals rally the end of July up to August. I think I heard him say that even until the end of this year.


By the way, here's the current price of gold: 



Latest Updates:



Why is it difficult for the markets to learn?





"During the selloff, gold hit 1141.90, just 30 cents above the previous low of 1141.60. It did manage to rally back, but not all that enthusiastically. Based on today's behavior, I'd guess the next try at 1141 will succeed. If the buck continues to rally, next stop for gold is 1130."


"The miners looked even worse, with GDX off -2.28% on moderately heavy volume, making a new six-year low just today. Last time we were here: October 2008."

"The dollar rose +0.51 to 97.28, making a new closing high for this cycle and inching up towards the May high of 97.88. The continued move higher in the buck is pressuring gold; while we here in the US whine about how horribly gold is performing, over in Europe they see gold moving more or less sideways over the past five weeks and right now it is about at the middle of its seven-week trading range. This tells me gold's swoon is entirely a currency effect. Strong dollar = weak gold."

"This suggest to me, if the buck keeps rallying, gold will most probably drop through 1130 support."

"Oil has dropped to the lower end of its recent consolidation range. My code says oil has further to drop."

"The code also thinks gold and silver are due for a rally. I have noticed that the code can be early - I see further downside ahead, given the strength in the buck."

"The buck is strong. There is no good news right now in metals or in commodities overall. If the buck continues to rise, commodities including PM will most likely continue falling."

As of 18 July 2015:
"Gold, silver, copper, platinum, palladium, miners, oil - all of the commodities I track fell this week. Gold actually held up better than most. However, gold also made a new 5-year low, which suggests to me that there is danger ahead. This tells me that, more likely than not, gold will break lower before it rallies significantly."

"Commodities are all looking bad. Dollar is rising, which is the likely cause for many of them. Oil is continuing to correct and has yet to find its low. . ."

"No catalyst yet for gold, or for silver, or for most of the commodity complex. Physical buying does not trump COMEX, and Shanghai doesn't look particularly excited to buy at the moment. Right now is a seasonally weak period for gold, improving somewhat in August. Likely, new lows are ahead. I hate to be a Gloomy Gus, but that's what I see."

"You may well say to yourself, 'the Fed will never raise rates' - but my sense is, the market believes they will, and that belief pushes the dollar higher. And of course, dollar strength right now ends up pushing commodities (and PM) lower."

"Senior miners sold off quite hard this week, dropping to new lows and ending Friday with hints of a capitulation, dropping to new lows last seen in October 2008. Miners haven't quite broken that 2008 low, but it is not so very far away. . . . Gold isn't the most unloved asset class in the world - that status is reserved for the gold mining shares."
As of 20 July 2015:

"Wow, what a bad day for gold. It fell -35.60 [-3.14%] on massive volume, with most of the damage happening during the Asia trading session. . . . This wasn't about the buck, or about commodities. Those things shape the trend; today's move was about a trading gambit pure and simple - and it worked."



"At 09:29 China Standard Time a huge number of contracts was unloaded onto the market; one article I read suggests the assault happened on the Shanghai Gold Exchange first, and then COMEX responded. . . . Regardless, the short assault snapped gold instantly through support and drove it down to 1080 in one minute. It was a $50 loss, clearly an engineered move designed to run the stops below 1130. . . .Bottom line: not enough traders wanted to buy the dip."



"The RSI-7 for gold is now hovering around 8, which signals a strongly oversold market. . . . I believe the gold market is ripe for a rebound, but so far, that's only potential. We have to see the buyers appear first. . ."



"Miner losses were catastrophic today, . . . Superlatives fail me, I've not seen losses this big in the mining shares ever. Its total and complete capitulation in the miners, everything is being sold. Usually this happens at or near the lows, but before I buy, I want to see a reversal pattern show up. . . . Juniors made new lows too."



"If you ever wanted to know what "capitulation" means, . . . of traders panic selling out . . . - regardless of price. Sell. Sell! SELL!!!"



". . . On days like today, a reasonable question is, when should we buy? Is now the time? What process might we use to decide?"



"One process is just picking a day and saying 'boy, XXX sure looks cheap, I think I should buy now!' Yesterday could well have been such a day for the mining shares - lowest prices in ages, a great deal to be sure. . . that strategy seems...sub-optimal."



"Another process is waiting for a 'reversal pattern' to appear. The concept is, before buying, you wait for the market to show momentum has changed direction. i.e. you wait for the knife to stop falling before you try catching it."



"How does this work? One simple method waiting for a swing low: a two-day chart pattern where the closing price of today is higher than the high of yesterday. . . . Waiting for the swing low would have stopped you from buying . . . That seems pretty good. At the very least, it would have saved you from today's disaster."



". . . I hate to say its a sure thing, but under today's circumstances, a swing low is a very powerful signal. Without high volume, without other signs of capitulation, the swing lows are more iffy."



"I like to say, 'wait for the buyers to show up.' The chart evidence for buyers showing up is a swing low: a two-day chart pattern where the second day's close is higher than the first day's high."



"So I should have mentioned that, after a major move like we saw yesterday, retail buyers (like you and me) see the lower prices, and rush out to buy. This will cause a big spike up in the morning, as retail buys the dip."



'However, once that first hour is over, then we get to see where things really go. Is the big money loading up, or selling the rally? This morning, GDX was up over 5%, and that rally peaked out at 10:26 EST, right at the end of the first hour of trading. It has faded a bit since then."



"This is why we wait for the close. The last half-hour of trading is when the big money decides to either buy and take whatever-it-is home for the evening, or to sell. "



"Many times I have been tricked into buying during that first hour. Sometimes its the right thing to do, such as when you see a major break above resistance, but in today's circumstance, when the market hasn't yet proven it wants to reverse course, its a bit dangerous, as that first hour rally often fades and by end of day, perhaps even turns red."



'I believe the PM market will turn, and soon. We have a great buying opportunity in the very near future. Capitulation is exactly what we want to see to set up the low, and we definitely saw capitulation yesterday. But we need to wait for the market to show us that it is ready to reverse. That could be today, or tomorrow, or the next, but I believe it is not far away."
As of 30 July 2015
"If the dollar keeps rising, we'll test the 1072 lows soon enough, and I'm not sure they will hold."
"Commodities are trying hard to reverse. It's not clear if they'll manage that now, or if they need to fall to a lower level to find buyers. Some parts of the commodity complex have marked lows, but the strengthening dollar may short-circuit any commodity rally if it continues. How long will this dollar move last is anyone's guess - my sense is it was driven by increased optimism for a Fed rate hike following the FOMC meeting that ended Wednesday."
"All we can do is watch and wait." 
3. From CNBC

"Ultimately, Garner said the key level to watch for gold is the support around $1,125 to $1,120. If the price can break above $1,230, that could trigger to make the bulls happy all the way up to $1,305 or $1,400."

4. From Williams Lindsey





5. From Profit Confidential

6. From Zero Hedge

". . . 1080 happens to be the multi-decade channel limit above which it breached in 2009 and the 50% retracement of the uptrend from 1999 low to 2011 high."

"Although Gold is holding the channel median support, RSI depicts an increase in bearish momentum resulting in the break below the up sloping channel in force since 2 years."

"This suggests the down trend could extend further towards January 2008 highs of 1045/1030 but also, from an Elliott wave standpoint, the projected target for the 5th wave of the broad bearish cycle that started at 2011 highs."

"Short-term, in light of daily RSI which is sustaining a 1-year low (blue line) a rebound looks under way. However, it should be viewed as corrective so long the Head and Shoulder pattern persists i.e. 1130/1146 levels hold."

7. From King World News

"I’m not a day trader of gold; I’m a long-term holder. The bottom line is that I believe that the gold market has now seen the worst. Could it go just a bit lower? Yes. But compared to an upside potential of well over $2,000, the downside risk is low.”

Sunday, June 14, 2015

Ang Pagkalugi ng Shareholder sa Stock Market



Tanong: Paanong nalulugi ang isang shareholder sa stock market?


Sagot: Nalulugi ang isang shareholder sa stockmarket pag bumaba ang presyo ng stock na kaniyang binili.








Tanong: Bakit ba bumababa ang presyo ng isang stock?


Sagot: Bumababa ang presyo ng isang stock sa iba't-ibang mga kadahilanan. ilan sa mga ito ay ang mga sumusunod: 


1. Pagkawasak ng mga makinarya o mga kasangkapan na gamit sa produksiyon. Ito ay maaaring sanhi ng kalumaan, kapabayaan o dili kaya ay pananabotahe ng ilang mga tao na may galit sa kumpanya.


2. Pagbaba sa inaasahang kita. Ito ang dahilan kung bakit kinakailangang basahin ng maigi ang mga financial statements ng kumpanya na bahagi ng kanilang public disclosure. Matutunghayan ang mga impormasyong ito sa kanilang annual at quarterly reports. Malalaman sa net income at earnings per share ng kumpanya kung tumataas ba o bumaba ang kita nito.

Bumababa ang kita ng isang kumpanya sa mga sumusunod na kadahilanan:


  • Pagbaba ng product demand

  • Pagkahuli sa paggamit ng makabagong teknolohiya. Kung ang kakumpetensiyang kumpanya ay gumagamit ng makabagong teknolohiya, normal na resulta na ito ay bababa ang halaga ng produkto. Ang kumpanya na nahuling sumabay sa ganitong mga uri ng pagbabago ay natural na makararanas ng pagliit ng kabuuang benta.

  • Pagtaas ng halaga ng mga hilaw na materyales na ginagamit para sa produksiyon

  • At mga panlabas na panghihimasok upang patigilin ang paggawa 


3. Capital Consumption. Ito ay nangyayari kung mali ang accounting system, masamang mga batas ng pagbubuwis o dulot ng mga maling business practices.



4. Pagtaas ng interest rates. Ang tendency ng mga negosyante pag mababa ang interest ay mangutang either for business expansion, pagbili ng sariling shares, o pag-iinbest sa ibang mga securities. Gayundin naman, dahil sa mababa ang interest rates, ang mga inbestors ay mas pipiliin ng bumili ng mga shares sa halip na mag-impok ng pera sa bangko. Sa kabilang banda, pag tumaas ang interest rates, kabaliktaran ang magiging resulta. Magiging konserbatibo ang mga kumpanya sa pangungutang at mas nanaisin ng ibang mga inbestors ang mag-impok na lamang ng pera sa bangko. At dahilan sa ang tendency ng daloy ng pera ay palabas sa stock market tungo sa credit market, bababa ang presyo ng stock.


5. Malinvestment. ito ay mga maling business decision na mag-invest sa mga maling linya ng produksiyon na hindi nagbibigay ng inaasahang kita. Kung ito ay hindi malulunasan ng agaran, nauuwi ang ganitong uri ng pag-aaksaya ng kapital sa bankruptcy.


6. Reaksiyon ng mga inbestors at traders sa pinananiwalaang overvaluation ng isang stock. Sa oras na ang merkado ay magduda sa batayan ng labis na pagtaas ng presyo ng isang stock, mas higit na dadami ang mga sellers kaysa sa mga buyers. Bunga nito, bababa ang presyo ng stock sa normal na level nito. Kayang lubhang mahalaga na malaman ang book value at price to book value ratio ng isang stock bago ito bilhin.




Reference:

Machlup, F. (1940). The Stock Market, Credit and Capital Formation. London/Edinburgh/Glasgow: William Hodge and Company, Limited.

Saturday, June 13, 2015

PSEi, Mutual Funds, and ETF: Pros and Cons

May iba't-ibang klase ng index funds depende sa sector. May financial index, mining index, property index, etc. at bukod pa yong PSE index na binubuo ng 30 companies na ginagamit na sukatan sa performance ng stock market. So ang mga companies na ito kinakailangang ma satisfy nila ang 3 requirements: free float level na at least 12%, dapat kasama sa top 25% in terms of median daily value sa loob ng 9 na buwan within a year, at ito yong top 30 companies base sa market cap. 

Major advantage ng investment sa indices ay mararanasan during the bull rally. And at the same time, pagninerbyos na ang mga bears, ang indices din ang unang naaapektuhan. So okey lang mag-inbest sa mga index funds kung naniniwala ang isang inbestor na ang PSE ay nasa bull market pa rin. Kung mga bears na ang naging dominante, mainam na dumistansiya muna sa mga index stocks.

Pagdating naman sa mutual funds, kumukuha rin sila ng mga stocks sa index at malaya rin silang mamili outside the index coming from growth stocks, cyclicals, and emerging stocks. And besides, may iba't-ibang klase rin ng mutual funds. Meron na purely stocks lang, meron naman bonds either corporate or government, merong combination at meron ding money market. 

Ang kagandahan sa mutual fund maaaring maka-avail ang isang investor ng mga blue chips stocks kahit limitado ang kaniyang pondo dahil sa pinagsasama-sama ang mga pondo ng iba't-ibang mga inbestors. So bilang isang inbestor, kasama ka rin kung tutubo o malulugi yong pondo. 

Sa ETF naman, unlike sa ibang bansa na ang ETF ay binubuo ng commodities, stocks, bonds or a basket of assets, sa PSE, ang ETF ay binubuo ng ilang mga stocks galing din sa index. Ang kaibahan lang nito sa mutal fund, traded siya sa stock market. Kung matutuloy yong recent development na pati mutual fund, puwede na ring itrade, halos wala na silang pagkakaiba maliban na lang sa mas malawak ang sakop ng mutual funds. 

Pagdating sa iba pang mga advantages halos pareho lang. Hindi na problema ng inbestor ang pamimili ng mga stocks. Bahala na ang mga eksperto. So angkop ito sa mga walang oras magresearch. Dagdag din dito yong pakinabang ng diversification. Ayon sa conventional na paniniwala, bumababa ang risk sa ganitong strategy. 

Ilan sa mga disadvantages ay yong underpferformance at overdiversification. Pag dating sa mga bayarin, mas okey ang ETF dahil wala ka ng babayaran na management fee. I am not sure dahil hindi ko pa nasubukan ang ETF kung ano ang ibig sabihin ng "no sales-load commissions" sa ETF. And the final advantage ng ETF sa mutual fund, nakikita ng inbestor yong ETF composition hindi kagaya sa mutual fund, pwedeng palitan ng fund manager ang composition ng securities na hindi alam ng inbestor.

And of course dahil sa ang nature ng ETF is to track the index, depende rin sa business cycle ang performance nito. 




Sources:





2. Index


3. ETF


Monday, June 1, 2015

ACE

Ang sabi ng mga experts, PSE is still in the bull market, sitting bull nga lang daw. Today, expected ng marami na red ang PSE. But contrary to expectation PSE rose from 7,580.46 last Friday to 7,670.37 today. Napansin ko, this first five months of 2015, from Feb 11 to 27 and March 25 to April 7, heavy ang buying ng mga foreign brokers. Pagpasok ng April, nag-iba na ang tono. From April 8 to 20 and May 8 to 28, heavy selling ang gawa ng mga foreign brokers. Today, June 1st, lumiit ang net ng foreign brokers down to 40,881.00. Hopefully, magbago na ang timplada in the coming days. 

As a result of heavy selling during the past two months, I decided to change my trading strategy. I call it "bottom fishing". Anumang stocks na sound ang fundamentals subalit nakaranas ng malaking % loss ay kandidato sa bottom fishing na ito. I am still testing this idea if it will work. Last Friday, both PNB and RFM fell down more than 14%. I thought of buying them today, but I changed my mind. I just want to observe if my projection is correct. It turned out that today PNB rose up 10.65% and RFM 6.16%. Kung bumili pala ako ng 2 stocks na ito, ayos sana ang gain. Anyway, nandiyan lang naman ang stock market. Today, after studying the decliners, I came up with one stock na sound ang fundamental, ACE. 



From 1.15 to 1.09, ACE's price fell down to 5.22% today. I think this stock is safe to buy below 1.09 for 84.27% of buyers today bought @ 1.18. Still the ideal price for me to enter this stock is between 1.00 to 1.03.

Other Relevant Information:

Today's Market Price: 1.09

Previous Price: 1.15

% Change: 5.22 %

Volume: 170,000

Number of Trades: 7

Top Buyer: Westlink, 194,000 @ 1.17

Top Seller: Angping, 118,000 @ 1.18

More solid sellers than buyers, 3 to 2

AR 2013 Book Value: 3.58

AR 2014 Book Value: 3.71

1Q 2015 Book Value: 3.75

AR 2013 EPS: 0.03

AR 2014 EPS: 0.13

1Q 2014 EPS: 0.05

1Q 2015 EPS: 0.04



Wednesday, May 27, 2015

FNI: Bashers and Hypers

As a five-month old small time trader, reading the comments on numerous threads from Facebook stock market groups provides me a free education how to conduct my own trading activity. Just recently, one stock caught my attention due to frustration of those who suffer big paper loss as a result of buying FNI on the basis of "experts'" analysis.

Out of curiosity, I checked FNI's company disclosures. I focused particularly on its 2014 Annual Report and 2015 1st Quarterly Report. I was looking for an answer for the constant decline of FNI's market price, and at the same for a potential gain. As the saying goes, "where there's smoke, there's fire." I know it's risky, but that's part of a trader's life. 



After reading the reports, I found details that are both popular and unknown to FNI owners. I am hesitant to post the unknown details on those threads for I do not want to be misunderstood as making fun of the pain of those who are losing their hard-earned money. Instead, I decided to write about it hoping that this article could help somehow in finding answer for FNI's decline. I know that the truth hurts, but knowing it is better than relying on false hope.

Before I share what I found, I want to clarify that I might be mistaken in my analysis. This is just my personal interpretation of the mentioned reports. I encourage FNI owners to check the documents for themselves.

These are the details:

1. FNI's book value as of 1Q2015 is 0.29. Of course, some technical analysts who consider book value as irrelevant in their trading would dismiss its importance. And others would even argue that the book value approach is not applicable to FNI. I respect their opinion. However, as for me, unless the firm has an established performance of earnings for several years, I would never venture buying a stock with a high Price to Book Value ratio.  


2. Increase in authorized and outstanding shares. From 7,300,000,000 authorized shares in June 2014, FNI has increased them into 35,871,428,572 as of December 2014. When it comes to outstanding shares, they were increased from 7,003,920,939 to 17,467,014,310 as of December 2014. I think it is important to understand the implications of these increase on your portfolio. Knowing the difference between the authorized shares and the outstanding shares affects your investment in that stock due to its potential for stock dilution. This is what Investopedia has to say about this: 
"Dilution reduces a stockholder’s share of ownership and voting power in a company and reduces a stock’s earnings per share when new stock is issued. The larger the difference between the number of authorized shares and the number of outstanding shares, the greater the potential for dilution."
Concerning the increase in outstanding shares, I think the acquisition of PGMC has a lot to say about this. In exchange to 99.5% ownership of PGMC, FNI issued 10,463,093,371 common shares to the 13 stockholders of PGMC. This is how I understand that "share swap" thing. 

3. PSE's suspension of FNI. PSE suspended FNI from public trading due to the firm's non-compliance with the 10% minimum public ownership requirement. This suspension took effect during the 1Q2013. As of December 2012, FNI's public float was 2.41%. The suspension was lifted after FNI complied with the PSE requirement and it resumed public trading again beginning 2Q2013. At present, FNI's free float level is 22.91%. It is just interesting that FNI declared a huge cash dividends of 1.656/share on May 22, 2013 while the lifting of the suspension happened on June 2013. 

4. Government incentives. Verify if this is true. Is it really true that PGMC's fiscal incentive and income tax holiday will expire this 2015?

5. Third largest nickel producer. This is popular. I think most investors know this that makes FNI's "low" price attractive. PGMC is considered as the third largest nickel producer in the Philippines. As of 2014, PGMC produced 10% of nickel ore production.

6. Unrestricted earnings as of December 2014: 4,691.5 M. This is another thing that makes FNI attractive. Considering this, the speculation that FNI will soon be delisted from PSE is unlikely to happen.

7. History of Market Price from 2012 to December 2014. As of 2012, 4Q was the best. It gave both a great buying and selling opportunities with a low price of 1.21 and a high price of 3.34. Realizing this, what's happening right now in FNI's price is not something new. As of 2013, 2Q was the best. You could buy FNI @ 0.9 and sell it @ 1.98. Reaching 2014, 1Q was the best quarter to buy @ 0.96 and between 2Q and 3Q as the best time to sell @ a price between 3.00 to 3.01. 

Question: What does this price history tell you about trading decision concerning this stock?

8. Key Performance Indicators. As of 1Q2015, FNI's ROE and ROA are (4.172%) and (3.030%) and its EPS was (0.030879). In other words, 1Q2015 had a negative return. There are traders and investors that such negative financial report is a sufficient reason to sell this stock. However, just focusing on 1Q2015 would give a superficial impression that buying FNI is not profitable. But if you will review the firm's performance during the previous year, you will get a bigger picture of the company's financial standing. As of AR2014, FNI's ROE and ROA were 89% and 63% and its EPS was 0.66. Now, that's impressive! Another thing I like about this company is its small debt. As of 2014, its Debt to Equity ratio was 0.41 and it was even reduced down to 0.369 this 1Q2015.  

9. Stock subscription. FNI deposited 50M of the 200M stock subscription in PGMC on March 31, 2015. 

10. Production period. PGMC mine is only in production durng drier months of the year between April to October of each year. This explains the 216,277M loss in 1Q2015, which represents the recurring and general administrative expenses of the company.

After reading these details, can this blogger be categorized as an FNI hyper or a basher? I can't control what you think. I am not an FNI hyper for I do not own any shares in this company. At the same time, I am also not a basher for I intend to buy at my entry price. My goal is just to satisfy my curiosity about the popularity of this stock. I also wish that understanding these details would be of help somehow particularly for those who suffer an emotional setback as result of paper loss. As for the "joke" that FNI's price could sink down to 1.00/share and even to 0.50/share is a possibility that present owners must prepare themselves emotionally. However, this is not the end of your world. The stock could bounce back anytime. 



Thursday, May 21, 2015

My # 2 Stock: DMPL-



Since Del Monte Pacific Limited acquired DMFI in 2013, its capital structure changed. During the early stage of the acquisition announcement, the market received it positively. After releasing to the public the firm's financial statements with negative returns, its share price started to decline. The firm stopped paying dividends to shareholders. Many investors left this stock. It was during its decline that this stock got my attention and so I researched for its cause. After reviewing the annual and quarterly reports of the company, I am still cautious. I think if DMPL will be able to digest DMFI, it will grow more than 4x its previous size. That would mean, its share price could jump from 12.68, its current price to above 40.00. There is no better time to buy this stock than now. Still the crucial part is the release of its 4Q FY2015!

---0---

Update as of July 1, 2015

1. Trade Summary 

Lowest Price: 11.56 

Highest %: 67.25% @ 12.00 

Average: 11.92 

Volume: 531,200 

Number of Trades: 91 

Net Foreign: 5,385,872.00 


2. Personal Interpretation

What do these numbers mean? The way I see it though the volume and the number of trades are still small, but this could be a signal of a reversal. If my memory serves me right, I think for 6 months DMPL's price just ranged between 10.70 to 13.50, a big drop from 27.05 in May 2013 due to DMFI acquisition. Another thing to notice is the entry of CLSA just today. Between June 15 to June 30, you cannot see CLSA trading DMPL. Unlike ATR Kim, which I consider an "early bird," CLSA is just waiting for the release of 4Q FY2015 before making a decision. As of today, July 1st, due to impressive improvement in DMPL's financial standing, CLSA is the biggest solid buyer with a net amount of Php 3,600,000.00 followed by ATR KIM, Php 1,102,004.00.

---0---

July 2 Update

Lowest Price: 12.00

Highest %: 56.58 % @ 12.70 (This is a good sign from 12.00 with highest % yesterday).

Average: 12.65

Volume: 584,400

# of Trades: 160

Net Foreign: 5,731,084.00

Notable Buyers:

1. ATR KIM

Volume: 300,400

Buy Amount: 3.8M

Average: 12.67

2. UOB KAY HIAN

Volume: 120,000

Buy Amount: 1.5M

Average: 12.67

3. DEUTSCHE

Volume: 62,500

Buy Amount: 786K

Average: 12.58

Notable Sellers:

1. The First Resources Man

Volume: 223,000

Buy Amount: 2.8M

Average: 12.67

2. PH Equity Partners (PEP)

Volume: 160,300

Buy Amount: 2M

Average: 12.69

3. BPI SEC

Volume: 51,100

Buy Amount: 643K

Average: 12.59

Comment:

The volume slightly increased compared to yesterday's trade. As for number of trades, 69 more were added. What I consider a good sign is the increase in average price in trading DMPL. I missed CLSA. Was it done buying and waiting for an exit price?

What I want to see in the coming days is the doubling or even tripling of volume and the number of trades. How I wish DMPL will return to its previous price of 27.05. But I think, it will take another quarter or if not the whole FY 2016 to convince investors that DMPL has returned to profitability. For now, as a trader of stocks with fundamentals, what I am guarding is unusual market volatility caused by uncertainty among investors and traders alike related to the possible increase of interest rates. In the meantime, I think I will guard the movement of the above 4 brokers to determine my own exit price: CLSA, ATR KIM, UOB KAY HIAN and DEUTSCHE.